Jordan aka FltAdmlWolf

The US Solicitor General's argument before the court today show exactly the problem with the "state's rights" arguments, and the justices saw right through it. The US basically argued "All the states that have civil unions have to instead have marriage, but everyone else can do what they want." That's ridiculous. I get where they're going -- they don't want to ask the court to decide that all of America must have same-sex marriage -- but it makes no sense and seems more regressive than progre...