Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Poll of the Month: Conflicting Opinions

Jona ch'Ranni

Poll of the Month: Conflicting Opinions  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. This month we want to know: In your opinion, what was the most compelling portrayal of conflict in Star Trek?

    • The struggle of the Maquis against the juggernauts of the Cardassian Empire and the Federation
    • The unprovoked attack by the Xindi attack on Earth (ENT)
    • Khan's rampage against Starfleet (ST: Into Darkness)
    • The duo-chromatic aliens in "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" (TOS)
    • The attack on Yorktown Station (ST: Beyond)
    • The Dominion War storyline (DS9)
    • Something else (Tell us more in the comments)

Recommended Posts

September is a month where the world remembers those lost to violence: the beginning of World War II in 1939, and the tragic events of September 11th in 2001. In reality, conflict makes up a large part of modern society. Many love to escape into science fiction to forget such realities. 

But part of what makes Star Trek so visceral is its portrayal of dangerous conflict. 

Star Trek has not been shy about developing storylines that examine conflict — between individuals, peoples, planets, and empires — and the fallout of such conflict. 

The Maquis, freedom fighters introduced near the end of the TNG series, played a larger role in DS9 and VOY. Made up of former Starfleet officers and Federation civilians rising against the oppression of the dismissive Cardassians and rule-oriented Federation made many viewers take a hard look at real-life events happening around them. Perhaps it made some uncomfortable because in the right circumstances, they could almost agree with the Maquis and their methods.

In the Enterprise series, a Xindi probe carried a devastating attack on Earth out. This precipitated a season-long story arc where Archer and crew had to respond to the attack. In the end, they found the Xindi to be responding (sort of) defensively. As someone misinformed them that the Federation would destroy their planet.

Khan Noonien Singh is many times highlighted as one of the top baddies of all of Star Trek. In Star Trek Into Darkness, he causes mayhem and destruction in London and Starfleet Headquarters. However, was he just protecting his brethren from the hands of the manipulative Admiral Marcus? Was he justified in his actions?

There are dozens more examples of conflict, some large and others small, that have pierced the hearts of the fans, and we want to know which ones jabbed at your soul the most? One of the above? Was it the duo-chromatic aliens in "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" (TOS)? Perhaps it was the attack on Yorktown Station in Star Trek Beyond? Or shadows of the Dominion War in DS9?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.